"One Nation Under God." President Trump Chooses Sonny Perdue for Secretary Of Agriculture

IWB ^

[Jim W N]

The only discussion is the one you have generated here with your unsupported conclusory assertions and your refusal to take your discussion offline makes your “concern” seem rather phony.

[fortheDeclaration]

I don't care how my concerns appear to you, the fact is that your post had nothing to do with the topic of the thread.

You were simply trying to draw attention to another topic of your own choosing.

[Jim W N]

Notwithstanding your phony assertions and phony “concern”, I explained why the Constitution is triggered and relevant to ANY federal action or department to which you replied with ad hominems and no-sequiturs. So add irrational and unreasonable to your phony assertions and phony “concerns”.

You don’t like the relevant statement I posted.

I couldn’t care less.

Go pound sand.

[fortheDeclaration]

Once again, you need to read what the post was about and it wasn't about the constitutionally of the agriculture dept.

No one cares about your 'deep' constitutional insights.

[Jim W N]

Speak for yourself. If you’re not a Leftist, you are a useful idiot of the Left. You have nothing to say and are a waste of time. You’re on my “no fly zone” list and I will try not to respond to you anymore.

[fortheDeclaration]

All anyone has to do is read what the thread was about to see that your post wasn't relevant to the subject.

I expect your 'this dept. is unconstitutional' posts will be showing up each time Trump appoints a new dept head, that would at least would make you consistent.

[Jim W N]

Nobody cares about your irrational and unreasonable arguments and “concerns”. I’ll post whatever I want whenever I want and will post constitutional implications regarding the feds every time I get the chance.

I couldn’t care less if you don’t like it.

Go pound sand.

[fortheDeclaration]

As I said, it wasn't about what I liked or didn't like, it was the fact that it was irrelevant to the thread.

That is the simple truth you refuse to accept.

[Jim W N]

Nobody cares. Go away.

[fortheDeclaration]

Actually, no one cares about your views on the Constitution, so you need to stop posting them on threads with other topics.

[Jim W N]

Get over it.

Good bye and good luck.

[Rebelbase]

Trying to find a Tyler Chicken/George Stienbrenner angle here.

[fortheDeclaration]

Nothing to get over, just stop trying to highjack threads.

[Jim W N]

Back at ya pal.

[fortheDeclaration]

I am not the one hijacking threads, you are.

So, the next time Trump fills a dept post, you don't need to post that the dept is unconstitutional.

[Jim W N]

You’re the hijacker here.

The next time Trump fills a dept post, IF it is an unconstitutional dept I will absolutely post that the dept is unconstitutional. Go pound sand if you don’t like it.

[fortheDeclaration]

Well, since most dept posts are unconstitutional, I look forward to seeing your posts and exposing them as irrelevant to the thread like this one was.

[Jim W N]

Couldn’t care less.

[fortheDeclaration]

Yes, you do, stop lying.

[Jim W N]

No, but you insist I plumb the depths of your confusion and won’t seem go away until I do.

If Trump’s choosing Sonny Perdue for Secretary of Agriculture was an act of tyranny, would you consider that a relevant issue or would you insist that pointing that out would be hijacking the thread?