Perhaps now, those people at EPA will start using real and verifiable science in applying the recommendations and guidelines for various environmental concerns.
One thing, right off the bat. Carbon dioxide is not, never has been, a “pollutant”, but a very essential part of earth’s atmosphere, and it has nowhere near the effect supposedly assigned in relation to either heat gain or loss in the atmosphere or surface waters, which makes the whole effort to regulate earth surface temperatures by limiting the CO2 content of the atmosphere meaningless. It is far too expensive to even try, and it would have no measurable result.
Climate may be changing, but it is of no known or logical mechanism depending on carbon dioxide as the change agent, and it is not affected in any manner by the activities of mankind. Oh, there are micro changes that anthropogenic activity CAN affect, in very localized areas, but the sum total of the entire biosphere involves so many factors, and is of just such huge magnitude, that human efforts are negligible and mostly self-canceling. And none of it is cumulative.
Excellent!