Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc

No it is not. They can take a bus, get a ride or, take a train, a taxi or walk. They are not required to stay where they are.

Driving is not a right. Nor should it be.


48 posted on 01/26/2017 5:50:01 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Jim from C-Town

“They can take a bus, get a ride or, take a train, a taxi or walk.”

They can’t load up the truck and move to Beverly Hills.

The alternatives you offer are unsatisfactory for any number of reasons, including practicality and expense. As a matter of fact, they are all “public transportation” with the exception of walking.

If you really want to tell America that walking is the equivalent of driving, especially long distance...well, I think you’ll get the appropriate reaction.

The pioneers had the Conestoga, the dust bowl refugees had Mr. Ford’s contraption, and 20th century America had the automobile. Now, the leftard weasels are on the verge of taking them away, for no better reason than their wackadoodle greentard delusions.

I think driving is a human right, and I’d like to see an amendment to recognize that.


49 posted on 01/26/2017 9:05:02 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson