Statist? Me? Because I question whether it makes sense to defund PBS? I thought name calling was the MO of liberals at a loss for a coherent argument. You must be the exception.
I’ve watched all of Trump’s rallies for the past year and I don’t recall his mentioning defunding PBS even once. I guess you’ll eventually have to call him a statist too.
But I quickly lose interest in conversing with name-callers. So ... buh bye.
>
Statist? Me? Because I question whether it makes sense to defund PBS?
>
No, but for the verbiage used. There is no ‘sense’ RE: PBS. It is, or it is NOT, an authorized function of taxpayer expenditure\govt authority.
YOU, as a Citizen, are free to give ANY amount of time\property to XYZ as you wish. Not steal from the taxpayers for ones’ own ‘pet project’.
>
I thought name calling was the MO of liberals at a loss for a coherent argument. You must be the exception.
>
Well, when one espouses “For the public ‘good’...”, I think the moniker is correct. That thinking doesn’t particularly jive vs. ‘small’\Constitutional govt...but I haven’t found (C) to be any better than us ‘kooky’ {L) [though they hold no Federal positions that *I* am aware].