https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2017/01/17/bill-would-require-corroboration-in-new-hampshire-sexual-assault-cases
"The bill up for a hearing Tuesday would require victims of sexual assault to corroborate their testimony if the defendant has no prior related conviction. "
Local police chiefs have been voicing out against this bill which is good. If only they could see the bigger picture behind this.
You can’t convict a murderer , a drug trafficker , or anything else on an accusation. But you can convict someone when they are just accused of rape/abuse/whatever? So by your logic President Trump should be sex offender Trump, after all he was accused of sexual assault by multiple women. By your logic you’re stating this. Are you insane?
What jury is going to seriously consider the character of the witness when the law is already one sided in women’s favor regarding pretty much everything?
You’re absolutely insane if you think this bill is a bad thing. Absolutely insane.
I love how they also say one of the “most under-reported crimes.”
FALSE FALSE FALSE.
ALL CRIMES ARE UNDER-REPORTED.
If you buy into this false statement then you’ve been spoon fed the MSM lies about sex crimes.
This touches on the heart of campus rape stories. Whatever man is accused of rape basically gets kicked out without a fair trial, having already been judged by the court of public opinion. No facts, no evidence needed by whatever school board.
We have feminism to thank for this (that’s sarcasm).
The sponsors are now trying to withdraw support of it....
but.......
“Since the bill made it to committee, the sponsors cannot withdraw their bill. The fate of HB106, whether it will die or move forward, now sits in the hands of the House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee member’s hands.”
https://www.legiscan.com/NH/bill/HB106/2017