Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

Early in Trump’s campaign, he tossed out the idea of stricter laws on media reportage on public figures essentially lowering the bar on libel. The idea got a lot of negative comments on this forum as being an attack on free speech and a bad Trump idea. European courts on the other hand take actionable libel seriously and therefore British tabloids and similar make sure they have the story straight about EU politicians before they publish scandalous stories. On this side of the pond, not so much.


14 posted on 01/22/2017 5:24:08 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SpaceBar
There are pretty specific requirements to prove libel against a public figure. And Donald Trump is about as public a figure as the world has ever seen.

One of the criteria is "actual malice." The other is "wanton and willful disregard for veracity." The "Russian whores pissing on each other" story could be considered an example of both, and Trump could very well build a case against any media that published that dreck.

21 posted on 01/22/2017 5:40:24 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson