When you watch it, please tell me why Chuck Todd, who I despise, insisted that Sean Spicer’s words were “provably false”.
First I wasn’t sure what narrative Todd, with an IQ of around 12, was referring to. Spicer did say the attendees at the inauguration was the largest ever recorded.
But Todd never made that clear what provably false statement was said by Spider.
Like I said, I have no respect for him and think he is very stupid.
Like Kellyann said, it was the media that showed those pictures alleging the attendees for Obama’s inauguration was way higher first. All Spicer did was deny that and he cited some statistics of his own.
I wanted to so bad what would be part of the provable false statement.
Because how on earth did Todd know this?
I suppose it’s that picture which does seem to make it appear that there are way less at Trump’s inauguration but it looks like on of the pics has metal housing or something....just a strange set of circumstances.
Again, why does this matter?
For they admit that even though Obama had an amazing turnout for his inauguration, Ronald Reagan had even more. Including ME!
But hey, Obama was America’s first black President. Obama had a reasonably calm campaign, there weren’t blocks of people ready to burn cars because of his election.
The media, as I understand and allow me to explain, wanted to have viewers conclude that so many showed up for Obama’s inauguration because he was a better man than Trump.
And THAT is why Trump had Spicer go out and do a smackdown.
And there was that silly thing about the MLK bust....that was an out and out lie.
Kellyanne KO’ed Upchuck.