‘This is the greatest guy’: Trump meets FedEx courier, offers him $10,000

WaPo ^ | 20 Jan 2017 | Justin Jouvenal

[Elsie]

... when I hit "Post" the system went down and the FP site disappeared.

So it's YOUR fault!!!!

[raybbr]

I bet FedEx fires him...

[HotHunt]

Okay. Okay. I admit, with my tongue firmly ensconced in my cheek, that I was involved.

But I had no choice. I am convinced that the Russian hackers wanted to jeopardize the mental health of the FReepers, by denying them access to news about Donald Trump's inauguration and the activities surrounding it for as long as possible.

Understand I have no direct evidence of such activity, but I can assure you, with as much certainty that Clapper and Brennen claimed about the Russian's tampering with Trump's election, that the Ruskies used me as a stooge to do their bidding.

[Elsie]

I didn’t let the down time go to waste.

I went out and burned a few vehicles to show my displeasure..

[Ancesthntr]

“natural born citizen clause.

It does not mean citizen at birth, making every anchor baby with no allegiance to the United States and its citizens eligible.

It means born here of citizen parents.
No possibility of being anything else.
No foreign birth.
No foreign parent(s)
No foreign citizenship(s)
Solely a US citizen.
No divided allegiances or loyalties.”

---

I could not agree more. I agree despite the fact that the proper reading of that particular clause of the Constitution makes my own children ineligible to be President. The reason is that their mother, who is now a US citizen, was not a US citizen at the time of their birth (though she was in the process of doing so). Well, too bad. Rules are for everyone at all times, and I’m not prepared to support anyone for President who is not eligible for the office. The one time in all of history that we apparently violated this rule, we got a disaster on steroids. That is exactly what the Founding Fathers strove to avoid, somebody who had divided loyalties. That Obama was the child of a British subject is particularly ironic, as that possibility was by far the most likely one that the Founders were concerned about when they put this clause into the Constitution.