Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PghBaldy

Completely strange, especially since this guy is not an Obama loyalist. He was appointed by Bush because he is loyal to the United States, not to Zero.

Changing command during the middle of an important deployment is a strange thing to do — why not replace him effective the next day?

Maybe he did something to p*ss Trump off while “negotiating with the inauguration committee” on a “number of issues?”

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/12/15/military-serve-ceremonial-security-roles-trump-inauguration.html


176 posted on 01/13/2017 11:52:38 AM PST by rebrane (Love Trump's Hat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: rebrane
Changing command during the middle of an important deployment is a strange thing to do — why not replace him effective the next day?

That was my take. It's seems quite abrupt and sudden.

178 posted on 01/13/2017 11:57:47 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

To: rebrane

Thats my point - you don’t change commanders at the height of battle unless they get shot, and that person already knows the plan, everyone else already knows who number two is. And the people above aren’t fully appreciating what’s likely to happen next Friday. It will be the worst day of venom the lefties have ever summoned. THE WORST. Forget Seattle. Forget Occupy. Forget Baltimore.


179 posted on 01/13/2017 11:58:30 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson