[nathanbedford]

Mark Levin has been sounding the same tocsin of alarm and he has illustrated his warnings with anecdotes from his own participation in the Reagan administration. His conservative bona fides extend that far back and they are genuine because they are moments of real action. The last one I remember is his recounting the story of finding Saul Alinsky's books being distributed by the Carter administration at our cost.

No one has been more explicit or more effective in attacking the establishment of the Republican Party than Mark Levin. In hour after hour he has identified by name those in the party among those who are elected and those in the media who fought against the nomination and election of Ronald Reagan. Mark Levin's personal credentials as a foot soldier in the Reagan campaign and later in the Reagan administration are indisputable. Mark Levin more than any other public figure in my judgment has drawn the indictment against the GOPe.

Mark Levin is not the problem, he is part of the solution, why in God's name do we shoot the messenger?

He has been loud and long in his criticism of the house leadership and loud and long in support of the insurgents including Dave Brat. He has recounted time and again the opposition by the Rino Republicans to Ronald Reagan. No one has been more emphatic than Mark Levin in describing the breakdown of conservatism over the years and the Republican Party. It is not just his criticism but as activism and commitment through his career and through Landmark Legal over decades which lends him credibility.

More, he has written influential books espousing true conservatism and has even advanced a very influential argument on behalf of Article V which is an attempt to cure the problems seen in Washington where Rino Republicans fail to counter leftist Democrats from outside the power center in Washington. Whether or not you approve or disapprove of a convention of the states, it is undeniable that Mark Levin has seen the problem and has advanced a solution.

It is hard to identify anyone in the pantheon of conservatives who are publicly known who would have been more strident in their attacks on Rino Republicans and who have lent their support to insurgents in the house and who has the lent his airtime to insurgents seeking election in House and Senate.

I know of no pundit who has been more right on all the issues. He is right on trade, right on immigration, right on convention of the states, right on deficits and budgets, right on the war against terror, right on Obamacare, right on environmental tyranny, right on the meaning of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. I know of no issue on which he is "wrong."

His career demonstrates that he walks the walk as well as talks the talk. I say again, Mark Levin is not part of the problem is part of the solution.

[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

Levin sold out financially to Cruz. When he did that, he committed an unforgivable sin and proved that he cannot be trusted. He’s gone, he just doesn’t know it yet.

[TakebackGOP]

“Mark Levin is not the problem, he is part of the solution, why in God’s name do we shoot the messenger?”

Because he didn’t do much to help Trump get elected.

[Reno89519]

Levin is loser that has repeated backed losers. He is no better than Beck and Lyn’ Ted. The sooner he is sacked and retired the better. Long winded defenses of him will not help. Are you paid to do so? Is he your secret boyfriend? Are you Levin in disguise? You and others are so incredibly intent on defending Levin and Lyn’ Ted, a bit if disclosure might be helpful.

[thoughtomator]

I don’t think there’s an antidote for someone who has imbibed THAT much Kool-Aid. Not sure why you’re the only one here who can’t see that Levin is and always has been a fraud through and through.

Just a heads up - if you adhere to Levin you are going to be increasingly uncomfortable in this environment.

[Lurkinanloomin]

“Birtherism” is the greatest Alinsky ever perpetrated.

They have gotten the American people to reject one of the most valuable safeguards bequeathed to us by the founders.
The natural born citizen clause served us well until we ignored it.
Barry Soetoro/Barack Hussein Obama should be proof enough of the wisdom of the founders when they tried to prevent him from being President by requiring someone who could only be a US citizen and nothing else.
Born here of citizen parents.
Naturally a US citizen because there is no other possibility.
One cannot be anything else and also be a natural born citizen.

It does not matter if he was born in Hawaii if his father was a foreign national.
Children of foreign nationals inherit the nationality of their foreign national parent(s).
Natural born citizen means born here of citizen parents.
No other possible citizenship(s).
Only when one cannot be anything else can one be a natural born citizen.

No foreign birth.
No foreign parent(s)
No foreign citizenship(s)
No foreign influence on the Presidency is what John Jay stated in a letter to George Washington as the reason for insisting on a natural born citizen.

Obama told us he was born a British subject.

Who believes Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Jay, Monroe, Madison, etc. would have found him to be a natural born citizen?

Who believes they would have thought the recently deceased King of Thailand was eligible to be President?
He was born in Cambridge MA.

Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009, happened with the complete cooperation of both parties.
They want the Constitution changed without the hassle of amending the Constitution.
Confuse people about the clear meaning of a three word phrase and voila, every anchor baby and Winston Churchill is eligible.

The bench was the reason the GOP went along with the fig leaf resolution for McCain that was used by the Democrats as cover for Obama.
Jindal, Rubio, Haley, George P. Bush and Cruz were all up and comers and the future of the party and ineligible.

The truth of the Kenyanesian Usurpation will never see the light of day because both parties cooperated in the violation of the Constitution