But it was OK for a black employee of Yale, who was disturbed by old stained glass images of black slaves picking cotton, to destroy those glass windows with those images of slavery.
In that case it was considered OK by the liberals to take matters in your own hands and remove an offensive image.
But in this case in Congress, the offending image doesn’t matter. In this case, the liberal criteria are said to be freedom of speech freedom of artistic expression, etc. Overriding the gross offensive nature of the images in question.
It amazes me sometimes how liberals judge people and situations based on an ever shifting set of criteria,, and that the criteria are not consistently applied.
Damn good point
Democraps stood by Obama when he booted the artistic bust of Winston Churchill from the White House.
FUDNC