Posted on 01/06/2017 7:11:36 PM PST by monkapotamus
Edited on 01/06/2017 7:21:52 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The intensely political James Clapper and John Brennan intelligence claim, outlining the
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
There is evidence that the Saudis contributed to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. Where is the ‘intelligence community’s” report on that?
See what I mean?
The U.S. media cranked out way more propaganda than the Russians ever dreamed of.......... just compare the coverage in UK papers to our own. It was a brutally apparent and obnoxious effort on their part to elect Hillary and defeat Trump. Fairness went out the window and they continue to double down on their favoritism.
The 4th estate has become nothing more than a mouthpiece for the DNC.
RT and Al Jazeera should not be broadcasting in the United States.
And we get called “conspiracy theorists”? This constantly changing “Russian interference” shtick has as much credibility as a Weekly World News story about Lizard Aliens using death rays to alter voting machine totals.
You mean they didn’t use death rays?
Islamic Media Attempts to Influence US Election
(Hillary Clinton Calls Al Jazeera Real News, Criticizes U.S. Media)
al jazeera supports hillary
(And I'm not even an intelligence agency)
Clap on! Clap off! The Clapper!
“RT and Al Jazeera should not be broadcasting in the United States.”
Really? Why shouldn’t they? Americans aren’t intelligent enough to evaluate biased reporting? Are RT and Al Jazeera any less legitimate than CNN or the Washington Post - (which has become an utter disgrace)?
What I object to is NPR broadcasting globalist anti-Trump propaganda using my tax dollars. That I want stopped immediately.
Because they are sponsored, supported, and owned by our enemies.
“Because they are sponsored, supported, and owned by our enemies.”
Are you talking about Al Jazeeera and RT or CNN and the Washington Post?
I believe your statement applies to all of these. I still favor the free exchange of ideas, as long as I’m not being forced to subsidize it.
It’s the CIA & FBI’s claim that zillions of American people were unduly influenced by the likes of RT (Russia Today) and Sputnik News, and what those organs and their fellow travelers pushed into the “social media” sphere?? Are they nuts??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.