And the harder the destructionists tried to play the moral equivalence game (see! Trump has bad things too!) the more people saw through their idiot level crap and then went to read up on Hillary’s (and the destructionist left) actual bad acts.
So, I’m gonna guess that Huffpoo’s reasoned advice is to double down on the stupid and cheer on as the destructionists dig their grave hole even deeper.
They didn’t actually double-down. They allude to defending her kept her negative business in the news for too long.
There was so much Clinton negative, they had no choice but to try and defend her.
Funny how none of this mentioned tweets on CGI, Bill the rapist, or Abedin-Weiner. I bet there’s more to the research and HuffPo cherry-picked.
Directly from the source of Eschelon:
More than half of the 10 most-tweeted-about stories were about political or election-related issues or, more commonly, about the politicians themselves.
“Trump consistently accounted for about 40% to 60% of the share of candidate mentions for the majority of the year leading up to the election, even during the primaries,” the blog notes. “Most of the time, this was roughly double that of Hillary Clinton’s share of mentions.”
IOW, Hillary did NOT dominate.
10 most-tweeted-about stories of 2016
1. Donald Trump
2. Hillary Clinton
3. Barack Obama
4. Bernie Sanders
5. WikiLeaks/Hacking
6. China
7. Ted Cruz
8. Cubs/World Series
9. Iraq/ISIS
10. Dakota Access Pipeline