Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop

SS is an easy problem to fix. The numbers suggest that adding just 3 months to the retirement age and 1 year to the early retirement age would make the system solvent.

62 year olds can work. Age is not a factor. They may have some other issue like a disease or other health issue. But age alone does not stop people from working at 62.


15 posted on 12/30/2016 4:00:18 AM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: poinq

“62 year olds can work. Age is not a factor. They may have some other issue like a disease or other health issue. But age alone does not stop people from working at 62.”

I’m 67 and still at work every day. My wife wants me to retire but I keep asking her, why? I’m still paying for people who never worked a day in their lives.


19 posted on 12/30/2016 4:19:15 AM PST by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: poinq

18 - 30 year olds can work if they crawl out of their parents basements and start to contribute.

There’s plenty of jobs but millennials won’t work unless they get a six figure salary and become President or CEO of a company within the first few weeks of work. Anything longer takes effort and effort and work ethic is something that’s completely foreign to them.

Nothing wrong with retiring at 62 or younger if you can. I prefer to enjoy life while I still can than work until I’m 70+.


30 posted on 12/30/2016 5:04:47 AM PST by maddog55 (America Rising)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: poinq
But age alone does not stop people from working at 62.

It depends on what kind of work you do. And with labor participation rates at 50 years lows, finding a job at age 62 is much more difficult. We have brought in 35 million legal permanent immigrants (equivalent to the population of Canada) since 1990. We have a huge surplus of labor, which also depresses wages.

46 posted on 12/30/2016 7:04:53 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: poinq

I don’t think that will come close to solving the problem. The estimates are that under current taxes and payments there is only 2/3 the amount of money needed long term. Benefits would have to be cut by one-third (across the board or focused on the rich or the youngest retirees like you suggest), taxes increased by 50% or some combination of the two. Early retirees who are 62 and normal age retirees between 67 and 67.25 years old don’t consume one third of the social security payments.


53 posted on 12/30/2016 7:36:31 AM PST by KarlInOhio (" T'was the witch of November come stealin' " And who could the stealing Witch of November be? Hmm?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: poinq

Now if only you could get companies to hire 60 year olds.


55 posted on 12/30/2016 8:10:14 AM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson