[JimRed]

We (our representatives, that is) need to set the example by having our kids either attend public schools, with the attendant security that it entails disrupting everything, or commit to homeschooling. Or how about the new administration folks teaming up to buy an existing charter school? The city would never issue a new charter to such a group, or they’d take several years to do so, but they couldn’t revoke an existing charter!

Then to rub salt in the liberal wounds, they could invite kids from the neighborhood who have stable families stuck there to attend. A little diversity and opportunity.

[i_robot73]

>
We (our representatives, that is) need to set the example by having our kids either attend public schools, with the attendant security that it entails disrupting everything, or commit to homeschooling. Or how about the new administration folks teaming up to buy an existing charter school? The city would never issue a new charter to such a group, or they’d take several years to do so, but they couldn’t revoke an existing charter!

Then to rub salt in the liberal wounds, they could invite kids from the neighborhood who have stable families stuck there to attend. A little diversity and opportunity.
>

Sure as shit if D.C. can make ‘mandatory service(s)’ *legal* (O’Care, etc.), the same can be done TO govt employees: Every program\service created MUST be utilized by any/all govt employee(s) and their immediate family.

Let ‘em be the guinea pig(s) first and foremost.

[jch10]

I am a retired public school teacher and my children could NOT attend public school today.