Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

Too easy:
and I really do want to debate you but, it says in the code “IF” he is arrested he has the option of which test to take.

He would not be refusing if he had already complied with a full FST and she believed she had a valid record of his blowing into the machine, not to mention what was recorded audibly and visually.


39 posted on 12/28/2016 9:24:29 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Vendome

“Too easy: and I really do want to debate you but, it says in the code “IF” he is arrested he has the option of which test to take.”

Obviously you quit reading when you got to a part you liked ...


C) A person who chooses to submit to a breath test may also be requested to submit to a blood test if the officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person was driving under the influence of a drug or the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage and a drug and if the officer has a clear indication that a blood test will reveal evidence of the person being under the influence. The officer shall state in his or her report the facts upon which that belief and that clear indication are based. The officer shall advise the person that he or she is required to submit to an additional test. The person shall submit to and complete a blood test. If the person arrested is incapable of completing the blood test, the person shall submit to and complete a urine test.


48 posted on 12/29/2016 6:14:43 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson