“The very fact that the image is curled on the left hand side, while the green background watermark is not curled is defacto proof of a manipulated image.”
Why? The watermark is on the paper that the image is copied onto, and shouldn’t be curled. The birth certificate is (supposedly) photocopied from an official record book, which would be curled because of the binding.
I see. You are saying the copy is official...
Stop polluting a good conspiracy theory thread with your explanations.
>
The birth certificate is (supposedly) photocopied from an official record book, which would be curled because of the binding.
>
...while still keeping the background\watermarks (the horizontal/verticle ‘||’) 1:1? I see no cut-offs, no ‘jaggies’, no slant; they all appear to be a PERFECT match.
That’s not even looking at the ‘electronic’ version w/ the layers of this high-school level forgery.