[Pravious]

“The very fact that the image is “curled” on the left hand side, while the green background watermark is not curled is defacto proof of a manipulated image.”

Why? The watermark is on the paper that the image is copied onto, and shouldn’t be curled. The birth certificate is (supposedly) photocopied from an official record book, which would be curled because of the binding.

[XEHRpa]

I see. You are saying the copy is official...

[FewsOrange]

Stop polluting a good conspiracy theory thread with your explanations.

[kabar]

Take a look at this video of the Arpaio/Zullo press conference and judge for yourself whether the electronic BC is a fake or not. The evidence is pretty compelling that the BC is fraudulent.

Here is a video of the initial findings in 2012 released at a press conference providing the forensic analysis of the fraudulent electronic BC released by the WH as well as Obama's suspicious draft registration document.

[bgill]

[i_robot73]

>
The birth certificate is (supposedly) photocopied from an official record book, which would be curled because of the binding.
>

...while still keeping the background\watermarks (the horizontal/verticle ‘||’) 1:1? I see no cut-offs, no ‘jaggies’, no slant; they all appear to be a PERFECT match.

That’s not even looking at the ‘electronic’ version w/ the layers of this high-school level forgery.