George Will forgot to mention some key facts.
The original drug sale by their son, at a location away from the house, happened more than two and a half years ago.
The parent’s “eviction” lasted one week, at which point the Police allowed the parents to move back into the home, as long as the son was not allowed to live there.
More than two years ago, after nation wide publicity, the city terminated its forfeiture case against the house, and the city made significant revisions to its forfeiture policies.
It’s basically referred to broadly. The IJ intervened and, if anything, maybe it was worse than what Will suggested, if it took a publicity campaign, not just legal assistance. If Will hasn’t clarified the intersection of the concern with Sessions — well, neither have you.
Trump success should not be made a ramrod for bad policy.
So if your post is correct, I don’t doubt it is, Will is using dated and old information to besmirch Sessions...
Will could just as easily wrote a damning article about state/federal abuse of drug seizures without bringing Sessions into it...
Though I would like to know Sessions position on it outside of what Will implies...