But no issues with “I got a phone and a pen...”
He was just “Borked”
Just wait until every obama EO is repealed...
“It’s the first Monday in October and the Supreme Court convenes for its 197th term, but with only eight justices; the admired Lewis Powell retired in June. There could have been nine justices in place had President Reagan proposed someone like him...
...But instead, the President chose Robert Bork and thus chose angry confrontation. For Judge Bork is not merely a conservative. He has long been a flamboyant provocateur, with a lifetime of writings to prove it. As a result, Mr. Reagan got the rancorous political battle he asked for...
...The Constitution does not state a right of privacy beyond freedom from unreasonable searches and the like; thus Judge Bork does not recognize its existence. Yet great judges and justices have found room for personal privacy in the concept of liberty enshrined in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments....”
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/10/05/opinion/against-robert-bork-his-bill-of-rights-is-different.html
In 1987, the liberals went all out to politicize the Supreme Court, with the NY Times and other Fake News media backing them fully. They did whatever it took to defeat an eminently qualified nominee. And from that moment on, I’ve seen ZERO reason to “be fair” about Supreme Court nominees.
Obama and Hillary wanted to strip the Supreme Court of meaning and turn it into an applauding repeater station for the DNC. May Obama, Hillary and the NY Times burn in hell - unless, of course, Obama or Hillary publicly repent and ask God to forgive their support of evil and perversion!
Hugh the Scot to NYT: Shut up, stupid.