A 10-day “cooling off period” is a huge leap in assumption there is some insane white guy out who can’t wait to shoot his wife or neighbor. All is based on fake news sourced imagery substantiation and not facts of history.
They should have found a test case where someone bought a new gun with identical qualities as a gun they already owned. Let the 9th Circuit twist itself into knots imagining a scenario where two identical guns in the hands of one owner are riskier than one.