Posted on 12/23/2016 4:15:26 AM PST by marktwain
Edited on 12/23/2016 7:16:23 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
The panel reversed the district court
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
“Look forward to Trump getting opportunity to appoint new members to the 9th circuit.”
Any openings are picked from a list complied by the Senators the court serves, ie...rabid barking moonbats in Sanfran.
F__k the State!
A ruling by a court is not a law; it’s an opinion. Only legislatures may write law. Period.
“reasonable” is a subjective standard. Such standards are so elastic that over time and given enough approvals from sympathetic courts those standards can be stretched to legalize nullification of an unalienable right.
“reasonable” is a subjective standard. Such standards are so elastic that over time and given enough approvals from sympathetic courts those standards can be stretched to legalize nullification of an unalienable right.
Except if a home invasion occurs during the waiting period. Oops.
A waiting period to stop crimes of passion is absurd. The “passionate” will just pick up a knife or a bat or one of the other firearms he already owns to do the deed.
Some of those who really need a weapon for defense against a palpable threat have died while waiting the two weeks before they can take delivery of the fiream. They were the victims of a crime of passion, enabled by an invasively stupid bureaucratic state.
That’s California. One can own 50 firearms and have to wait 2 weeks to take delivery of any new purchase. Idiotic.
He does not have to follow their guidance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.