Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Appoints "Death By China" Author To Head Trade Office, Hints At Trade War With Beijing
zerohedge.com ^ | Dec. 21, 2016

Posted on 12/22/2016 7:56:31 PM PST by Helicondelta

Another day, another shot across the bow from Donald Trump aimed squarely at China.

Having already participated (and in the case of one, precipitated) two mini diplomatic snafus with Beijing in just the past two weeks, Trump is sending a clear message to Beijing that US-China trade under his administration will be anything but business as usual, by creating a National Trade Council inside the White House to oversee industrial policy and has decided to appoint a hard core China hawk to run it.

According to the FT, which broke the news, Trump has chosen Peter Navarro, a Harvard-trained economist and one-time daytrader, to head the NTC. The author of books such as "Death by China" and "Crouching Tiger: What China’s Militarism Means for the World" has for years warned that the US is engaged in an economic war with China and should adopt a more aggressive stance — a message that the president-elect sold to voters across the US during his campaign.

Speaking to the American public, Trump said “I read one of Peter’s books on America’s trade problems years ago and was impressed by the clarity of his arguments and thoroughness of his research,” Trump said. “He has presciently documented the harms inflicted by globalism on American workers, and laid out a path forward to restore our middle class.”

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookrevew; crouchingtiger; deathbychina; navarro; ntc; peternavarro; redchina; trumpcabinet; trumpchina; trumptrade; trumptransition

1 posted on 12/22/2016 7:56:31 PM PST by Helicondelta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

If you go to China and visit the stores you realize how few US products make it onto the shelves. If they are there, they have had to pay a huge tariff and are not price competitive with other products. 10% is a good opening volley.


2 posted on 12/22/2016 8:07:46 PM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

About time. So, so glad the Clintons, Bushes, and Obama are gone.


3 posted on 12/22/2016 8:08:33 PM PST by WMarshal ( Schadenfreude, it feels so good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5VhfY_5YNV4


4 posted on 12/22/2016 8:10:26 PM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Good deal.

China and the rest of the world need to realize that we won’t be trampled over. It’s time for fair trade.


5 posted on 12/22/2016 8:10:27 PM PST by boycott (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Most of the items are knock offs as well


6 posted on 12/22/2016 8:13:32 PM PST by arl295
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Time to short Walmart and Harbor Freight?


7 posted on 12/22/2016 8:13:40 PM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

8 posted on 12/22/2016 8:14:22 PM PST by 4Liberty (DEMOCRATS- Exporting Jobs, Importing Votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

China has walked all over us economically, because there has been no resistance at all.

Their economy is highly dependent on our market, and they are very vulnerable right now.

A “trade war” with China might just be a simple trade slap down.

The big test will be to see if all of the trade deals and international trade bodies established can effectively neuter the exercise of national sovereignty by the USA. I don’t think so.


9 posted on 12/22/2016 8:18:06 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

And to build the Mexican Wall, Trump can use all the bricks that Obama and the MSM will be shitting over this!!


10 posted on 12/22/2016 8:19:35 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

My post from a similar thread for the sake of consolidation:

Hey Chyna, this is what real negotiations will look like for the next eight years. No more pussies smiling at you from across the table. We will talk about real things, and trade on equitable terms.


11 posted on 12/22/2016 8:26:01 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Time to short Walmart and Harbor Freight?

I recall that back in the 80's, Wal-Mart advertised that all their products were made in the USA. I wouldn't sell them short. They buy in such bulk and average a 40% markup, they'll find other suppliers.

12 posted on 12/22/2016 8:31:37 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

40%? Oh, that’s funny. Try 65%.


13 posted on 12/22/2016 8:33:33 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Peter Navarro is right about China.


14 posted on 12/22/2016 9:52:46 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

BRAVO, Trump!


15 posted on 12/22/2016 10:13:50 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Well said bigbob!!

Best election ever!

16 posted on 12/22/2016 11:35:12 PM PST by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

“...the new office is also likely to be seen as controversial by mainstream economists, many in the business community and pro-trade Republicans.”

“pro-trade Republicans”

That nonsensical line always amazes me. Even people with a room temperature IQ are in favor of trade. Who is not in favor of trade? I love trade. If we all had a bottomless market to absorb our manufacturing and commodities, we would all be wealthy.

The simple concept of “fair trade” is explanation enough. Nations have historically sought to get the upper hand in trade deals, until certain people in the United States, globalists, got their noses out of joint because of the prosperity of the American middle class. These people, using insane trade deals, have successfully cut American wages by half. It now takes both a man and his wife working to earn what the man use to earn by himself.


17 posted on 12/23/2016 4:04:02 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Yeah, but he went to Harvard.


18 posted on 12/23/2016 4:35:08 AM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson