Wait! Wait! It's not over!! The COTUS can still reject the Electoral Votes

U.S. House of Representatvies ^ | 12-19-16

[Az Joe]

I'm just tryin to give the Liberal lurkers more hope.

[BipolarBob]

before they get the rug jerked out one more time.

[Bullish]

Do you think the democrats want even more egg on their faces?

[Publius]

Much like the end of “Carrie,” where Cissy Spacek’s hand comes out of the grave to grab Amy Irving.

[rey]

It’s like the song that never ends!

[boycott]

[EDINVA]

fourth loss?

[rey]

Forgot to add this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xz6OGVCdov8

[goldstategop]

Unlikely, in a GOP Congress.

The vote counting in a joint session of Congress on Jan 6 is simply declaring the result before the country.

Trump’s enemies only recourse is impeachment. Good luck with it.

[x]

Wow! COITUS is that powerful?

I'll have to try it some time.

[dirtboy]

They are thinking they can get Trump impeached and removed within the first six months. Because the RINOs will be willing to join the Dems in doing such. Fat chance.

[cdnerds]

They tried this with GW Bush in 2000 and 2004. I didnt go anywhere in 2000 because they didnt have a senator. In 2004 they did and it still went nowhere.

[Riley]

Do you think the democrats want even more egg on their faces?

There's a Democrat under that massive mountain of egg?

[Fhios]

I think losing three times constitutes a ‘schlonging’. What comes after schlonging? Buggery?

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

They’re gluttons for punishment. S & M. Sickos.

[Vaquero]

They’re gonna get slick willy to perform COTUS on the house and senate??

[gunsequalfreedom]

Oh my. I thought it was over. Now this. Also today someone told me in one year he will be impeached.

[Popman]

-—Do you think the democrats want even more egg on their faces?-—

Liberals do not get shamed...

[lafroste]

By my math the dem’s would need to invalidate 78 Trump votes. That’s more than 1/4 of all of them. Not a chance in Hades.