Thanks for your response.
Many are saying he was only shot once, through the heart. Others say he was shot once, in the spine. You are saying there were multiple wounds. One of the bullet pushed a piece of his clothing (probably his tie) through one of the wounds in his abdomen. So the 'claim' none of the bullets went 'through' his body would then be wrong. And where's the blood, if it did go 'through' ?
I wouldn't be questioning these things if I thought that the 'media' (here and in other countries) always told the 'truth', and if I believed that 'governments' never did anything wrong or faked 'incidents' to gain power or fool the populace into 'favoring' some 'action'.
I heard the audio. The guy I think emptied several bullets into the man.
You can see the video showing the ambassador's reaction the instant he is hit. The killer shot multiple times directly at the ambassador and, since the killer had both police and special forces training, he undoubtedly hit the ambassador with most, if not all the shots we hear.
You don't need any reporter or any person posting on the internet to tell you these things. You can hear and see them for yourself. Skepticism is one thing, but refusal to believe facts in front of your own eyes and coming to your own ears is quite another.
There is no absence of blood. Like all liquids, flowing blood will seek the lowest level -- in this case, through several layers of cloth and under the body of the ambassador who fell straight down and onto his back. He was wearing a dark suit and sweater, so you would not see blood easily in the images we have available.
Surely in your own life you've seen flowing blood from a cut or other injury. Blood drips or runs downward toward the floor, and if you put a cloth or cotton on it, the material absorbs the blood. There is absolutely no difference in this case of the ambassador's murder.