“As a result, a person or persons engaged in keeping Obama’s fraud hidden, went into the National Archives and STOLE the foreign-arrival-records for HI for the week including Aug 4, 1961, and ONLY for that week.”
Great point, FW, and I wonder if there were any safeguards in place when this theft occurred sufficient to allow the thief to be identified of if we are now just out of luck, as we are with some of the stuff that Sandy Burger swiped.
Hi again—and thanks, Seize, for the pings. They are appreciated.
Nothing could be simpler than figuring out the identity of the person flying into HI in ‘61, during the week of Obama’s (supposed) birth. This is because there are only two people whose arrival in HI from a foreign country, at that particular time, would destroy Obama’s birth narrative.
Namely, Stanley Ann, or her mother. (Her father’s arrival from a foreign country would be problematic, but likely explainable.)
It wouldn’t have been Stanley Ann. She would not have gone to all the expense and trouble of flying a newborn into HI (assuming she’d have been allowed to) only to depart almost immediately for WA state. Had she been in HI, she’d have stayed there, and continued her education at the university.
That leaves the mother. Why would she have arrived in HI during the week of Obama’s supposed birth, from a foreign country?
There’s only one rational explanation. Mom flew to the country where Stanley Ann gave birth, remained with her daughter for probably about a week, and then flew home to fake-register a HI birth for her grandson. No other circumstance comes remotely close to explaining all the weirdness re Obama’s records and the twisted, fraudulent birth narrative. (As has been mentioned before, had this fraud been planned well in advance, the LFBC would not have had to be thrown together, slap-dash amateur-style, at the very last minute. It would have been an impeccable, original BC from Day One.)