Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CIA’s War on Trump
Accuracy in Media ^ | December 12, 2016 | By Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 12/13/2016 11:12:15 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee

You couldn’t fault Donald J. Trump for concluding that the CIA is out to get him even before he starts his presidency. Former CIA officials Michael Morell, Michael Hayden and Philip Mudd have all denounced him. Plus, former CIA operations officer Evan McMullin ran against him as an independent presidential candidate.

Obama’s director of the CIA is John Brennan, who recently disclosed that he voted for the Communist Party (CPUSA) ticket when he was in college. He was hired by the CIA anyway and quickly rose through the ranks, even though the CPUSA was funded by Moscow and known to provide cover for Soviet espionage activities.

The liberal media haven’t made Brennan’s disclosure into a scandal and didn’t call for any investigations of Obama’s CIA.

Clearly, having an “intelligence” connection doesn’t mean you are intelligent or have good judgment. Making “America First” is not a requirement for serving in the CIA and other intelligence agencies. You can have numerous skeletons in your closet and even be a transgender. If you have any doubts, consider reading the CIA’s “Diversity and Inclusion Strategy (2016-2019).” It is Brennan’s masterpiece. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Logical me
Here is LC's take on the hacks and who did them. The CIA is lying their ass off. Its what they do.

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2016/12/lame-cherry-exclusive-who-was-behind.html .............

The Lame Cherry is going to settle this once and for all in who was behind the Russian DNC hacks and the source is Julian Assange's intimate associate, who served with MI6, and his name is Craig Murray.

This is the official statement on his site:

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

That is the reality. I am telling you that the Obama regime knows damn sick who sent Wikileaks all of this insider information, and is covering it up with Hillary Clinton in this Russia email hacking smokescreen, because it was a

DEMOCRAT WHO COPIED THE FILES AND SENT THEM TO ASSANGE!!!

21 posted on 12/13/2016 11:50:36 AM PST by rodguy911 (Go Sarah go! America home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

No reason at all to fire everyone, dismantle the agency and begin again from scratch. No reason at all. they are all up to their necks in treason.


22 posted on 12/13/2016 11:53:15 AM PST by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

He will fire them. If you strike the king you must kill him or he will kill you - simple.


23 posted on 12/13/2016 12:00:25 PM PST by quantumman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: poinq

The last time the CIA was accused of domestic spying, the left went bonkers. I remember the Congressional investigations and crucifixion of the agency. And until now, the left has NEVER unquestionably accepted a “condifidential” CIA report and paraded it around as gospel proof.

Of course, now that the CIA has become their political instrument, the left is OK with all that.


24 posted on 12/13/2016 12:04:03 PM PST by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff

Fyi


25 posted on 12/13/2016 12:06:21 PM PST by Dog (..."I'm just a cook....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Dismantle with extreme prejudice!


26 posted on 12/13/2016 12:06:30 PM PST by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Dismantle with extreme prejudice!


27 posted on 12/13/2016 12:06:37 PM PST by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
The CIA’s War on Trump

Will be one of the shortest wars in history.

28 posted on 12/13/2016 12:08:15 PM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Hmmmm... Maybe we have more double agents in our Government then we think..?? Lots more..!!


29 posted on 12/13/2016 12:10:01 PM PST by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

IIRC, Murray was at the Foreign Office, not MI6.


30 posted on 12/13/2016 12:13:22 PM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood
Gee, ya think?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVnndRNFy-8

"Published on Dec 6, 2016

Documentary highlighting the key role CIA leaders have played in building inclusive environments. The video focuses on the cultural shift that occurred within the Agency since the signing of Executive Order 12968, which gave LGBT officers the right to obtain a security clearance and serve openly in the Federal Government."

31 posted on 12/13/2016 12:15:59 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Trump needs to levy 100 % payback on this ass#ole

Brannon should be pushing a shopping cart , with his few remaining meager possessions , out behind a shopping center somewhere , by the time Trump is done with him .


32 posted on 12/13/2016 12:42:16 PM PST by LeoWindhorse (America First !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poinq
The CIA is troublesome when its working within the US.

It's more than just "troublesome," it's illegal.

33 posted on 12/13/2016 12:44:41 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Fire em all


34 posted on 12/13/2016 12:45:01 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux; rodguy911
No, no, no ... lol.

Please read this from right before the election ... Former British Ambassador Claims Source Of Podesta Leaks "Comes From Within Washington"
35 posted on 12/13/2016 1:06:25 PM PST by onyx (PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP'S VICTORY DONATE MONTHLY or JOIN CLUB 300!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Once Bush created Homeland Security he opened the door.


36 posted on 12/13/2016 1:14:22 PM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux; rodguy911
Intelligence Officer Who Personally Met the Democratic Email Leaker Confirms Leaker Is with AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE Services"

The former intelligence analyst, British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, and chancellor of the University of Dundee, Craig Murray, wrote yesterday:

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.

 

***

 

I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

In other words, Murray – a close friend of Julian Assange – says he knows for a fact that there were no hacks at all … instead, an American insider leaked the information to Wikileaks.

Today, Murray writes:

If you set up the super surveillance state, hoovering up all the internet traffic of pretty well everybody, that is not just going to affect the ordinary people whom the elite despise. There is also going to be an awful lot of traffic intercepted from sleazy members of the elite connected to even the most senior politicians, revealing all their corruption and idiosyncracies. From people like John Podesta, to take an entirely random example. And once the super surveillance state has intercepted and stored all that highly incriminating material, you never know if some decent human being, some genuine patriot, from within the security services is going to feel compelled to turn whistleblower.

 

Than they might turn for help to, to take another entirely random example, Julian Assange.

This confirms what the NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – previously said:  the leaker was from U.S. intelligence services. And see this.

And Murray confirmed to Washington's Blog by email that Binney "was on the mark."  And see this.

In other words, Russia did not hack the Democratic party emails.  Instead, an American intelligence whistleblower leaked them.

It wouldn't be the first time.

Update: David Swanson interviewed Murray today, and obtained  additional information. Specifically, Murray told Swanson that: (1) there were two American leakers ... one for the emails of the Democratic National Committee and one for the emails of top Clinton aide John Podesta; (2) Murray met one of those leakers; and (3) both leakers are American insiders with the NSA and/or the DNC, with no known connections to Russia.

And see this.

Postscript: As we've pointed out for years, the NSA is collecting all digital communications, including emails, in America.

The NSA then shares this information with numerous other agencies, including the FBI, DEA, etc.

We've noted that the NSA’s big data collection itself . Remember, the Pentagon itself sees the collection of “big data” as a “national security threat” … but the NSA is the biggest data collector on the planet, and thus provides a tempting mother lode of information for foreign hackers.

And we've documented that the Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all other presidents combined.

It sounds like this witches brew of bad policy is what led to the Democratic email leaks from an insider in the intelligence services.

But if anyone wants to try to prove Murray and Binney wrong, it should be easy to check.

 

 


37 posted on 12/13/2016 1:16:19 PM PST by onyx (PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP'S VICTORY DONATE MONTHLY or JOIN CLUB 300!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Patriot Act and HSC have always bugged me. Given the threats I suppose it made sense at the time, but anyone with any amount of foresight should have seen what it could become, and apparently has.


38 posted on 12/13/2016 1:16:50 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

So it should be no surprise who hired the “cut-out” and who, in turn, hired the trigger man for the pile of corpses in the wake of Bill and Hillary.


39 posted on 12/13/2016 1:24:58 PM PST by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chuck allen

Headline of the Day Poll

Why are Democrats saying Russia interferred with the presidential election?

They are concerned with the integrity of the system
They are trying to delegitimize Trump’s presidency

Read more: http://www.headlineoftheday.com/2016/12/11/why-are-democrats-saying-russia-interferred-with-the-presidential-election/#ixzz4SkyUoypF


40 posted on 12/13/2016 1:38:52 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies Tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson