Posted on 12/13/2016 10:09:12 AM PST by Enlightened1
Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary. He has never wavered, never changed his statement. His close associate, former British Ambassador (Uzbekistan) Craig Murray, has said the same. It was an inside job. Not Russian hackers.
These are the only two people in the world who know the source. Only two people who have actually met the source. Both deny Russian involvement. Both say it was a Clinton insider. After new calls from the democrats to investigate the leaks, a stunned Murray came forward again to set the record straight.
He said,
“There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”
“I know who leaked them.”
“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian.”
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”
CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN
The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.
Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.
Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnewspolitics.com ...
Why are you telling me this? I don't think I've ever expressed interest either way on the subject.
...and you and me!
I read that Assange has disappeared. However, his beloved cat still is at the embassy. The belief is that there’s no way in He’ll he’d go anywhere (willingly) and leave his cat behind. FWIW...
That wasn't an inside job.
Could the same thing have happened to the DNC, or were they too savvy for that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.