Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timocrat

They signed an agreement not to that is binding. It was a stupid thing to do, but they did it. It just got extended for another 4 or 8 years.


83 posted on 12/12/2016 9:32:55 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1; Timocrat

Look up the 1981 consent decree, or go here: http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/

The consent decree was just renewed, there was a post here on FR about it in the last few weeks.


85 posted on 12/12/2016 9:36:43 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: jurroppi1
It just got extended for another 4 or 8 years.

It got extended for four years from December 2013:

In deciding the case, which stems from a 2008 lawsuit brought by the DNC, the district court clarified ballot security efforts as “any program aimed at combating voter fraud by preventing potential voters from registering to vote or casting a ballot,” and upheld the consent decree while adding a Dec. 1, 2017, expiration date.
The RNC appealed, saying that its decades-long compliance and good faith should justify ending the consent decree.
The Third Circuit upheld the district court’s decision and modification, saying that just because the RNC had largely complied with the order, the “mere passage of time” does not count as a change of facts that would warrant lifting the order.

91 posted on 12/12/2016 10:24:54 AM PST by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson