"Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!"
Posted on 12/12/2016 12:57:43 AM PST by Enlightened1
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
The DNC emails weren’t hacked, they were released by an “insider” who wanted to expose the party for rigging the 2016 election for HRC.
Sorry, I've been trying to novelize this scenario, and I can't even get started.
Suppose I'm a Wyoming elector (I know I guaranteed NH, but we got robbed). Suppose I have my writ of appointment in my hand, and I go down to Cheyenne next week and vote for Donald Trump.
Now, my vote and the others get sent to Biden, who opens them on January 3 in the presence of 535 Members of Congress.
Who, or what, can prevent that process?
That person needs to come forward ASAP in order to save America from a civil war. Trump can assure his/her safety. Until the truth comes up, we’ll be living in a blender of turmoil. Enough already!
Maybe Trump can do a Tweet or TV ad requesting this patriot to do the right thing for the sake of the country.
Yes, it’s why she did not bother to campaign until the last week of the election. We need to vote with paper ballots and a blue finger after we sanitize the voting rolls.
"Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy theory!"
Why are there 17 intelligence agencies?
Turf, power, etc. Remember the USGS? They made maps. Now they study global warming. They spun off a separate piece to do mainly classified geospatial analysis called NGA. NGA now has a GIANT building in southern Fairfax county outside of DC. That’s one of the 17.
If there was any vote tampering, it was done by the democrats. And without any proof of tampering, the election DJT stands.
These losers are angry that their insipid internal communications and inner working (and rigging of the 2016 election for HRC) was exposed to the public. It’s called deflection...
I think that they definitely can get by with some tampering of the software in selected precincts.
Read this: DSW accused of rigging the primary election against her democrat opponent. It’s amazing she even ran for office after getting the boot from the DNC.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3485797/posts
“Here’s an independent statistical analysis of my race against Debbie Wasserman Schultz, concluding that the official primary results are “mathematically implausible” and suggesting possible manipulation in the vote tabulation. Should we manually counts ballots in our elections? These researchers say yes.”
http://www.hollerbackfilm.com/blog/wass-can
From the study:
In the race between Wasserman Schultz and Canova, that does not happen (Figure 2). As more and more votes are added in, instead of the pattern approaching the average level of support for each candidate (a flat line) Wasserman Schultz’ percentage climbs continuously in a mathematically precise pattern, and Canova’s percentage decreases steadily. We will discuss later in the post exactly how precise the pattern is. This is not the expected statistical pattern. This graph is by Anselmo Sampietro, a mathematician who holds a Master of Statistics degree from the University of Bologna, Italy.
Continued from #129
This report is highly suggestive of software manipulation (FL) that gave the candidate an overall 7% advantage.
In order to more closely approximate the reported totals, it is necessary to give Wasserman Schultz 100% of the Black vote, and lower her support in other demographics. This projection is closer, but still does not match the reported totals (Figure 8).
Figure 8 - The reported totals exhibit a steeper increase from the smallest to the largest precincts than any combination of the actual votes.
No matter what percentages of the actual votes we distributed to the candidates, we were unable to replicate the reported results.
If the division of the votes is close to what we started with in Figure 7 and then a manufactured 3.5% increase in Wasserman Schultz’ results, and a manufactured 3.5% decrease in Canova’s results are input into the graph, then the reported totals can be replicated almost exactly (Figure 9).
This would seem to imply some kind of manipulation was necessary to obtain these results. It is possible that the reported results are based on demographic trends, but that those trends are being exaggerated in some way.
powerful stuff....I agree with your comments..
7% is about what most of the fake polls were giving hillary as her lead
McCain does not have Stockholm syndrome. He is a lying sociopath.
Will be great seeing Obozo and his wife frog marched out of the White House on Jan.20th after refusing to leave because the Russians actually voted instead of Americans
I think all these claims by Hitlery that the Russians interfered is a smokescreen that she took billions in illegal foreign money through the clintoon foundation.
The constitution does not provide for any such action
If we were to vote again, what? We would have to forget what we learned from Wikileaks? Hillary gets free throws?
If we were to vote again, we’d know where to place security and observers to eliminate or drastically reduce that fraud that gave Hitlery the “popular” vote. And a lot of people, given what they’ve seen of the left since the election, would be even more determined to vote for Trump. She’d lose even bigger the second time around.
Sorry, but Seth Rich is unavailable for comment.
Some agencies want their own work force, research and products
Can’t blame them given the corruption agenda pushing and politicization we now recognize at certain alphabet agencies
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.