Posted on 12/10/2016 7:14:42 PM PST by boycott
Here is how Clinton wins:
1. Flips WI (10), MI (16), PA (20). New totals: Clinton 278, Trump 260
2. Flips MI and PA, WI from does not vote at EC. New totals: Clinton 268, Trump 260.
3. Flips WI and PA, MI does not vote at EC. New totals: Clinton 262, Trump 260.
Without flipping PA, Clinton does not win. Stein threatened to recount other states but she has not and I believe it is too late to petition before the EC votes on Tuesday.
Stein is relying on the undervotes which are ballots that had no vote for either Trump or Clinton. For example, Michigan has about 85,000 undervotes and was won by Trump by about 11,000 votes. Stein believes she can ‘divine’ the undervotes or be assisted by Clinton criminal accomplices in pulling a switcheroo of ballot boxes, to find at least 11,000 more votes for Clinton.
I have lost track of where Stein stands in the court battles with PA but I recall she has an appeal for a PA statewide recount. She has to have a statewide recount there because of the USSC decision in Gore v. Bush 2000. I don’t think she gets it before Tuesday so it is not clear to me why she is still counting.
So If Wisconsin declares that Clinton won the state she will get 10 move electoral votes. Putting her at 242. If Pennsylvania decides to recount and does not meet the Dec. 13th deadline (Tuesday) then Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes will not be counted, so Donald Trump would lose 30 electoral votes putting him at 276. If they were actually able to recount then Hillary's electoral count would rise to 262 vs. Trump's 276.
Sorry, there is absolutely no way Hillary can win at this point, nor is there anyway that Donald J. Trump can be denied.
This is now all about making the election seem tighter than it really was, and bolstering the call for the elimination of the electoral college and replacing it with the popular vote.
Of course Stein, and therefore Clinton, are stopped.
The analysis I gave was an estimation of their strategy, that is all.
Without Michigan. the election is over.
Democrat leaders need a party line for their base to use going forward. Schumer has already told the base that the ‘Russian hacking helping Trump win the election’ that this ‘fact’ should shake everyone to their core. He states this without questioning the veracity of the allegations so that it becomes the new fiction turned into reality. But he’s typical of democrats.
Stein lost in court, not by the recount, so she thinks and so will millions of democrat voters think. They will think that again the election was a ‘selection’ by the courts. The media never reports that the FL 2000 election recount after the USSC Gore v. Bush decision still showed Bush won.
Any person that commits voter fraud just one time should pay dearly. I am talking min. 5 years in prison for just one offense. And we need people watching it closely.
The Beckel strategy.
Here called it ‘ targeting,’
Oh okay. However, I think it was understood how they were intending to steal the election. Pad the heavily Democrat voting areas with votes that had not been counted correctly. That has historically been their method of stealing elections at all levels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.