No, I asked for you to show me which source I said is trusted.
You have made an assumption, I’d like you to show me what it is based upon.
In post #12, your comment mocked the integrity of the source. You made an assumption based on the silly name. That’s fine, but I did claim the author was ‘NOT Brian Williams.’
If you are to assume this source is not necessarily trustworthy, then you must have some basis of comparison to other news sources which are supposedly deemed trustworthy.
You assumed, ... then I assumed. It works both ways.
How about the BBC- from today’s headline?
“The BBC conceded it was false to describe the Church as being ‘silent’ in the face of Nazism. The BBCs internal watchdog has found that a programme wrongly accused the Catholic Church of silence about the Holocaust.”