Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump was RIGHT about Air Force One: Pentagon budget... more than $4.2 billion
Daily Mail UK ^ | 12.8.16 | Dave Martosko

Posted on 12/08/2016 3:56:15 PM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
If you Google search 'Air FOrce One Trump' this article does not appear. Google is trying to hide it. If you Google 'air force one, "trump is right"' then it appears - without the "trump is right" part of the title. The little commie pricks working at Google need a knuckle sammich.
1 posted on 12/08/2016 3:56:15 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

why does af1 need 700 passengers seating abilty?


2 posted on 12/08/2016 4:03:41 PM PST by ColdOne (( I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Not tired of winning yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Two billion for an airplane is ridiculous, unless it can fly to the moon.


3 posted on 12/08/2016 4:04:13 PM PST by Rennes Templar (Sea levels are rising- from liberal tears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Trump wins another one against the mob of ankle biters.


4 posted on 12/08/2016 4:06:11 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

It doesn’t.

Most space is taken up by technology and private residence, as well as comm gear and encryption, as well as nuclear technology.


5 posted on 12/08/2016 4:19:53 PM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

There are plenty of C-17’s in the USAF inventory. Easily configured.

That would pretty cool using those. The press corp could use one configured for airborne drops.


6 posted on 12/08/2016 4:21:43 PM PST by Clutch Martin (Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancake, just as every culture has its egg roll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Will the liberal who mocked him apologize?

Don’t hold your breath, folks.


7 posted on 12/08/2016 4:23:36 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

America is not an empire. Our President doesn’t need a flying castle

This is just one of a million examples how government and everyone connected with it sucks a nation dry.


8 posted on 12/08/2016 4:24:46 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Plus Boeing was in the process of moving to China.

This is because they could not move to South Carolina? Remember that?


9 posted on 12/08/2016 4:24:50 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The contract is for aircraft, 2 for Trump 2 for Pence.

Af1 only looks like a 747. Internally it is beefed up to withstand close nuclear blast.

1. It is the command and control center for our country in time of war.
2. It must be able to communicate with our armed forces when under duress.

It is an amazing aircraft and worth every penny.

Nesides. A billion just isn’t what it used to be


10 posted on 12/08/2016 4:25:43 PM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

thank you for info


11 posted on 12/08/2016 4:25:52 PM PST by ColdOne (( I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Not tired of winning yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

The profit margin is listed and known to the USG. It is tracked clsoely and will not exceed 10% profit.

It is a unique aircraft with unique technology requirements and hardening and Top Secret capabilities, and that makes the platform expensive (cost per unit plus classified technology and other gear).

The USG has on site DCMA agents at all stages of development and they track the costs and reliability and other aspects that ensure the USG is not being taken to the cleaners. DCMA watches closely the development and costs, and are direct observers/participants of Program Management Reviews. . .no secrets kept from the USG.

It is not like Boeing just threw a number out there well beyond reasonable bounds (10% profit is well, well below commercial profit margins).


12 posted on 12/08/2016 4:26:01 PM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

How about a small very fast Air Force One


13 posted on 12/08/2016 4:28:25 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Moving to China was for the 787 wing spar. Not jet production, and most assuredly NOT AF1.

Wanted to move to South Carolina but obama stepped in and sided with the Wash State unions to try and stop the move to South Carolina.

787 production toand ensure delivery. That said, Boeing selected South Carolina because it is a right to work state (non-union), and obama wanted to force Boeing from re-locating the line to South Carolina because he wanted to support unions.

Obama lost that fight. Boeing won.

http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/boeings-decision-to-move-to-south-carolina-has-turned-into-a-legal-nightmare/Content?oid=3461150

Bottom line; China has no part in the AFI build or the 787 assembly.


14 posted on 12/08/2016 4:32:40 PM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin

Ya! Like the whole bottom opens up.


15 posted on 12/08/2016 4:34:33 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If there is a nuclear blast, most of our mostly-worthless members of the House & Senate want to be on that survival flight with the President. The rest of us are expendable.


16 posted on 12/08/2016 4:35:31 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Good idea.


17 posted on 12/08/2016 4:35:38 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
"Two billion for an airplane is ridiculous, unless it can fly to the moon."

Not necessarily. A "stock" 747, without any of the extensive enhancement necessary to serve as AF1, costs over $400 million (and that's not counting the cost of the engines - long story why). The AF1 cost also undoubtedly includes development costs for the technologies involved, all of which is spread across two aircraft instead of thousands, as in the case of civilian versions.

I think Trump is actually using this example more as a shot across the bow to let defense contractors like Boeing know that when we begin rebuilding our military capability, they shouldn't expect it to be a free for all. There will be extensive oversight to ensure that the value for our tax dollars is maximized. I'm pretty sure that was what he was getting at.

18 posted on 12/08/2016 4:40:52 PM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Thanks.


19 posted on 12/08/2016 4:41:06 PM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The current Air Force One planes will reach the end of their expected useful lives in 2017.

So what does POTUS ride until these are ready in 2021 ??

20 posted on 12/08/2016 4:41:06 PM PST by dfwddr (Lock her up !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson