So, Strac6, how much time did you spend looking through the links I posted? If you want evidence, it’s right in front of your eyes.
What is the one compelling piece of evidence that would stand up in court and PROVE your allegations beyond a shadow of a doubt?
It does not exist.
Old legal saw “If you make a derogatory statement you cannot back up to court standards... you may well be asked to do so in court by the person to affected.”
By the way, yes there are pedophilia rings in DC, throughout the country and around the world, even in your home town.
When he dies, I will publish proof I have of a VERY senior former US diplomat who was involved in such conduct and how that conduct helped lead to the Hostage Crisis in Tehran. He no longer engages in such conduct.
That said, there is not one iota of PROOF linking Podesta to any such activities.
For an insight into thus very real and very sick reality, I would suggest reading “Weeping in the Playtime of Others” and other works by Kenneth Wooden.
I’m with you on this.
“Shadow of doubt” is an ignorant use of an irrelevant term when referencing a court legal evidence threshhold.
If I recall, beyond a “reasonable doubt” for criminal cases and the “preponderance of the evidence” (51%) for civil cases.
We are not in court. We are giving our opinions based on the information presented to us with as much fact finding and verification as we can reasonably do.
Most adults have had to learn to derive an opinion and make a decision with less information than we would want. Some call it wisdom and leaderhp. Others call it discernment or experience. However, some people cannot come to a reasonably accurate analysis and conlusion until they watch the documentary years later.
You have written a very plausible and accurate analysis of the information you have found.
I followed several of your links and that reinforced my opinion on the bigger picture on this matter.
Thank you. And keep up with your logical analysis method.