Which is entirely beside the point, and just another attempt from you to change the subject.
The entire point of this seemingly endless dialogue between us was that you were incredulous when I pointed out the story was just a rumor with no substance behind it, originating from, well since you don’t like the word “hoax”, let’s say a website with an anonymous author who steals information from other websites and inserts false information into those stories before he posts them.
You’ve basically already acknowledged that, you aren’t even arguing that point anymore. You’re just grasping at straws to try and save face.
>>Which is entirely beside the point,
No, it’s just not “the” point you’d like to focus your delusion upon.
FACT: You can’t refute the information regarding Clinton’s association with the arming of ISIL.
FACT: You can’t refute the truth that ISIL is documented to be involved in human trafficking.
FACT: Nobody, except you, really gives a shyte whether those indisputable revelations came from Wiki Leaks, Judicial Watch, Alex Jones - or the Tooth Fairy.