>>Now, the DIA documents quoted in that article are real, but they did NOT come from wikileaks,
LOL. That’s your idea of “hoax”?
“Judicial Watch files show Clinton hacks occurred as WikiLeaks released info disclosing China hacking”
http://dayontheday.com/2016/11/01/judicial-watch-files-show-clinton-hacks-occurred-as-wikileaks-released-info-disclosing-china-hacking/
Who’s on first?
It’s no more a “hoax” than the Journalistic Suuuuper Geniuses at 9”NEWS” little exercise in “ooops” dis-information...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3502056/posts?page=32#32
>>Every website has an IP address.
That’s right Genius - one that’s traceable for the purposes of litigation.
Is there any litigation pending against these alleged “hoax”sters?
Meanwhile, the character of at least one visitor to the Obama White Hut is in plain sight:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3502155/posts?page=25#25
“buh buh but, social issues don’t get votes”/FAIL!
“LOL. That’s your idea of “hoax”?”
They took information from Judicial Watch, without attribution, attributed it to a fake source, and even put up a poorly photoshopped fake version of the document they were supposedly being leaked by the fake source. Yes, that is a hoax.