Posted on 12/04/2016 1:26:24 PM PST by cmt21
WI recount, day 4 spreadsheet: Recount of precincts w/958,453 Election Night ballots in; Trump lead extended by 39 votes. ~35% complete.
Some of Milwaukee still out, and all of Madison still out. Madison is hand-counting.
We will catch their asses in the act. I am an election officer and with the new methods in place it is getting tougher to stuff the ballot box. There are watchers from both parties in there so it is very tough. Stein is trying to muck up the Electoral College. She needs to be prosecuted.
If that were the case, Trump would have picked up more than 39 votes.
Because it’s 3 days old, and won’t show up on most people’s FR feeds. It is a good post though, might be a good idea to have one every day so it stays fresh.
Yes. They will be later. But pretty impressed that 35% are already in.
Laundering money to Stein.
Then there need to be fraud/RICO charges.
Dane County is slow walking the deal.
Just ignore that BS and go to the actual source:
http://elections.wi.gov/node/4510
Summary data from the spreadsheet: http://wbay.com/2016/12/03/recount-results-day-three/
The recount process always finds some errors, like a group of ballots someone forgot to count or an entry on the wrong column, but they are going to be very small. As will the undervotes where the optical scanners could not read the voters mark in the largest counties that use them. But one expert says that undervotes won’t exceed 1000 votes statewide and will be split in the proportion of the the overall vote.
THey could have been done in 2 days if they’d used the scanners. I’d love to see a new state law mandating an initial recount using automated means and then based on the result of that, have an even higher standard to force a manual recount. Both fully paid for by the challenger.
But why not do the machine recount first? Because if it confirmed the election night count to with a fraction of a percent (which it will) there would be no point in doing a hand recount.
i wonder how stein is going to feel speding about 4 million to have trump increase his victory over her and hillary.
There will be no “manufacturing of votes”.
Probably pretty good if the fed. court for PA case and MI courts strike her down. She/her cause (whatever that really is) will be rich.
Stein: 30 votes. What a joke she is (but a very bad one at that).
“If Trump had lost and the constitution party was pressing for recounts they’d all be blaming him and scouring for connections between the campaigns.”
Without any exaggeration, what your wrote is the absolute truth.
Yes.
That is why the MSM isn’t doing more reporting on the recounts. They do not want to know the truth.
many thanks for that link, Owen!
Your Wisconsin update, some of Dane county done:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500337/posts?page=158#158
and #164 question on Milwaukee, and its replies:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500337/posts?page=164#164
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500337/posts?page=168#168
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500337/posts?page=171#171
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500337/posts?page=172#172
anyone else reporting this ?
Ana Ortiz-Monasterio Draa, a Wisconsin recount observer representing third party candidate Jill Stein, posted the following information to the Facebook group which observers have been using for information sharing:
“The county election board did their hearings for disputed ballots at the front of the room. The only large number of votes that was in dispute was 500+ City of Milwaukee votes they were going to toss because the ballots were not signed. I argued the case against the Trump volunteer from NY. The board followed their precedent of not disenfranchising voters because of poll workers errors, accepted the votes.”
Her post can be found in the comments section of this Facebook post. https://www.facebook.com/groups/161274124347333/permalink/162266814248064/
In other words, these five hundred votes were ignored during the original vote totals, but will now be included. With Hillary Clinton having received two thirds of the original vote in Milwaukee County, it’s likely that the vast majority of these five hundred new votes are also for Clinton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.