Posted on 12/02/2016 6:35:40 PM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/02/recount-news-heres-the-latest-on-the-recount-efforts-in-mi-wi-and-pa.html
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
I doubt legal American voters overseas outnumber the military overseas by 5-1...
But, as you said,...It’s Philadelphia....
Are these “vote counters” trying to say Hillary received an additional 22,000
votes, but Donald Trump didn’t receive any??
No, Trump also received some in Philly. It appears some of the confusion is the certified numbers from all counties have not yet updated on the SOS site.
Below is copied from Decision Desk HQ.
As we reviewed more rural counties today, Trump’s margin creeped back up.
Current tally in PA after reviewing a few more counties’ sites today:
Donald J. Trump (REP) 2,965,046
Hillary Clinton (DEM) 2,917,443
Too late. Not a chance that this will happen in the future. This is it. Last chance. All aboard, final call.
Not on Twitter partner. I just don’t trust city machine dims as far as I can throw them. I have seen dims stealing votes in all kinds of ways. For example; buying votes in NC by paying people in line at the polls to vote for dims. Manufacturing votes in nursing homes. Busing voters in from out of city/county/state. All the dims need to know is how many votes they need to manufacture. They waited until the count was essentially done and just before certification they show up for a recount so they can get their fraudulent votes in to steal the election. Federal and state courts protect them from law enforcement and rational legal challenges. So I worry about their shinanighans. There is good cause for worry. Somewhere right now the dims are manufacturing the votes they need and are looking for the opprutunity to insert them in the process.
As if being trounced three times wasn’t frustrating enough for them :)
My state passed a constitutional amendment for voter ID this election, passed with 63%.
Ping
The ballots all come from Philly area.
But yes, traditionally absentees tend to go GOP, except out of heavily democratic areas.
It’s not impossible when you’re cheating. All this talk about “this won’t change anything” is Leftist misdirection if you ask me. These states couldn’t count the votes in a month and they’re supposed to have recounts in less than 10 days? To everyone who says we’re worrying over nothing. It’s not that we’re scared, it’s that we know leftist.
Elections, even those including contests for federal offices, are run by the states, so what would be the legal justification for a federal NVID that the USSC would uphold? The only current parallel even remotely related to federal intervention in state elections that comes to mind is the Justice Department's scrutiny of several states for racial gerrymandering.
If I recall correctly, the advent of the provisional ballot came about after the 2000 Bush/Gore debacle.
Clintons have been a stain on our voting integrity. First motor voter, than his VP trying to cheat his way in with a select Florida recount.
All of the examples you mentioned in the first half of your post are done on or before election day, though. If they cheated, they didn’t cheat enough. There has been no recount in PA yet, and there still might not be one. She missed the deadline for a statewide recount, so now the legal standard is much higher. I don’t know how things will go on Monday, but she still has to find another 47k votes to beat Trump in PA. It’s really not that easy to “discover” that many ballots.
Final, until they decide it’s not. This system is rigged. I have no doubt in my mind
I think those are all of the outstanding ballots. Alleghany is done with all their ballots. , they just haven’t certified their votes.
Motor Voter is a Federal mandate too. So there is precedent it seems to me.
[This system is rigged. I have no doubt in my mind]
PLAN A failed. They’ve moved on to PLAN B - disenfranchising TRUMP’S cabinet and administration picks.
LS,
Thanks for the info!
I don’t think they can manufacture votes on a recount; some of the results mentioned here by nuc 1.1 are before the election, and some after... IIRC the ‘after’ is harder to mess with:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3500912/posts?page=124#124
When was the last time a recount discovered 80k+ votes in favor of one person? If we were talking 1000-10000k votes, I’d agree that it’s a possibility. But, who, in their right mind, would believe that there was an 80k vote shift in the vote?
>>Elections, even those including contests for federal offices, are run by the states, so what would be the legal justification for a federal NVID that the USSC would uphold?
Good question - I would state that because the process is so decentralized, a legitimate state ID would be necessary, and the Fed can deem that free voter IDs should be provided by the state, but that said IDs must have AN ENDORSEMENT on the ID showing that they have submitted a birth certificate, naturalization form, or US passport linked to the state ID in order to verify their voting status. This would eliminate 95% of fraud.
But, who, in their right mind, would believe that there was an 80k vote shift in the vote.
If one were to be so kind that a liberal is of sound mind, all of them would.
More to the point, has it been challenged and subsequently upheld by USSC? I read all their cases and have for about twenty years and don't recall that occurring.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.