Most deals involve both a carrot and a stick, but she said threat...WOW. Did she say what the “threat” she was referring to was? Possibly tariffs of some type on products shipped back into U.S.? Possibly saying government contracts would favor U.S. companies? I don’t see those as threats- I see that as outlining future policy plans that may help a company make a decision.
The use of the word “threat” shows media bias against Trump, as usual.
Was this before or after CNN wished Trump’s plane had crashed?
Fake/Biased News!
"I won!"
"I have a pen and a phone."
Four years of the most negative spin they can put on any subject if they think it will hurt Trump.
It will make the snowflakes on the coast fill good, but will harden the hearts of those in flyover country.
A choice has to be be made and I believe the alt-left media has chosen badly.
BRAINLESS!!!
Wrong, CNN (as usual).
There was both a carrot and a stick used. But, SO FREAKING WHAT if he did threaten United Technologies and its billions in defense contracts? The goal was to keep jobs here, and it worked. IOW, government (or pre-government, since he isn’t even President yet) is working for the average person in the street - ain’t that a novel concept?!
FU, Communist News Numbskulls!
It’s called leverage and all good negotiators use it when possible. Could CNN possibly report on Trump for once without all the spin?
I said the 15 months ago, biased CNN and the rest of the lying corrupt network media are de facto Trump opponents. And they had no business whatsoever being involved in moderating political debates.