Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djpg

“.... Why is Jill Stein, who got about 1% of the vote, allowed to request a recount which can never result in her winning g the election??”...

Personally, I believe the recount is being pushed by Clinton and using an agreement made between themselves and Stein’s camp. Clinton is the one who came closest to Trump and doing a recount MAY show she gained more votes (most likely illegal votes) that MAY put the “Pants Suit Hag” into the winners column. Hitlary jumped on the recount band wagon AFTER Stein initiated the recount fiasco so she would appear somewhat “neutral” but a hopeful winner. Tin hat theory perhaps but nothing I would put past the Clinton’s .


28 posted on 12/02/2016 6:25:52 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: DaveA37
The recount effort is not about winning the election. Flipping one of these states (WI, MI, PA) is a pure fantasy. Flipping all three of them is laughable. And that's what would have to happen.

This is about planting the seeds of grievance in the minds of liberal moonbats, who will nurse their fears that the election was "stolen" for four years.

All the D's have left are these liberal idiots. They've got to hang on to them.

32 posted on 12/02/2016 6:30:33 AM PST by TontoKowalski (You can call me "Dick.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: DaveA37

I am more cynical. I believe that Clinton was behind it from the beginning and thy Stein was a front all along.


46 posted on 12/02/2016 8:09:33 AM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson