Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Well not that I see much reason for the law but they did it for General Marshall in 1950.

Mattis wouldn’t be the first defense secretary to require a congressional waiver. President Harry Truman appointed Gen. George Marshall to the position in 1950, nearly five years after he retired from the Army. Congress granted the waiver (at the time, the interval between active duty and defense secretary service was 10 years).

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/21/politics/james-mattis-defense-secretary-waiver/


75 posted on 12/01/2016 1:46:33 PM PST by MNJohnnie (This revolt is not ending, it is merely beginning.- Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

Now that is an interesting parallel. A “Marshall Plan” to restore and to rebuild America after WW Obama.


192 posted on 12/01/2016 3:02:25 PM PST by Ezekiel (All who mourn(ed!) the destruction of America merit the celebration of her rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/21/politics/james-mattis-defense-secretary-waiver/

And CNN is never wrong?

Here's the law in question: 10 U.S. Code § 113 Nothing in it about waivers.

Regardless of how they do it, Mattis will be Secretary of Defense.

229 posted on 12/01/2016 3:49:26 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson