Posted on 11/27/2016 6:49:06 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Why do recounts always - ALWAYS - result in less votes for the Republican?
...Frankin is from Minnesota....
Minnesota votes are usable in Michigan under DNC rules.
It’s going to be very suspicious if the recount does not proclaim a random error factor dominating. If in the recount the results aimed at recertifying Jill Stein’s standing always primarily benefits Clinton, then the whole result of reprocessing ought to be tossed, with no further relief allowed.
Whenever there is a recount the effing libs gain votes.
There has not been a recount, there has been a review and certification.
Apparently the writer thinks a review is the same as a recount which is not the case.
To do a recount they will have to open all the machines. That has not been done and will not be done unless there is a court ordered recount.
I don't see much of a chance of that happening, there are no grounds.
[Hey, I’d put my ballot in her box anytime.]
You better play safe balloting, you never know if all those hundreds of other ballots that were in that box weren’t something that spreads.
In this case those votes come from provisional ballots.
Apparently democrats are more likely to vote provisional then republicans.
It looks like the Demonicrats will have to run off a lot more fake ballots that find their way into “misplaced” ballot boxes, which will magically be found by Demonicrat-appointed election judges.
Thanks, and your point supports my initial thoughts.
Michigan done. 16+ for Trump!
Looks like they had a 2500 vote cushion in case it was close. Trump won by more than thier cushion. Probably the same story in WI and PA. Trump got more votes than what they could steal the election with. They knew how much the cushion was that’s why she conceded.
My kids went to college in Minnesota and voted absentee ballot in every election. Michigan Minnesota Wisconsin have tuition reciprocity. Tens of thousands of votes available to be found.
The recounts are to delay certification of the results so the electors CAN'T vote.
This would de-legitmize Trump as the winner.
And if the House certifies the EC vote without the recount states, the tards can say it was stolen, further hurting Trumps legitimacy.
Hey!
Show some respect!
I voted for Cherunda Fox!
( ok, I didn’t)
No, they are not.
Unless they were in the hands of the county clerk by 8:00 pm the night of the election they do not count.
There is no grace period.
You win today’s prize ! Ha!
A keeper ! Ha ha. The Washedup Poopoo is SUCH a loser rag. Ha!
Ha! Well I don’t know who she is but you sure could of done a lot worse in this election!
There is no grace period until a judge rules that thousands of recently found absentee ballots would disenfranchise thousands of votes. Doesn’t anyone remember the “we only want to make sure every vote is counted”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.