“The recount comes at the request of Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who says it’s important to determine whether hacking may have affected the results. Stein says she also plans to request recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan.”
What the courts should decide before the recount can begin is whether there is reason to believe there was hacking involved. Recounting votes for the sake of recounting will not determine whether any fraud actually occurred.
Therefore a recount is meaningless and without standing.
good point. need to know and be able to check for what is being looked for in this “recount”.
That’s similar to what I posted elsewhere earlier. That for a recount, they should know what total number of voters actually voted and be sure they have only that number of ballots. Then recount to be sure the ballots were awarded to proper candidate. if they find more ballots then number of voters then it’s no guarantee the “recount” total is accurate total.
I Wonder if they do any looking at voter rolls etc to recalculate if the total of ballots equals what they have as people who voted?