To: BenLurkin
That aside, how outrageous wfc’s theory is will depend on the wording of the customer’s agreement with them.And if the customer didn't sign the agreement for accounts fraudulently opened in their name...? I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter at all what the agreement states since they're not a party to it.
4 posted on
11/26/2016 5:12:19 PM PST by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: kingu
The agreement they actually did sign might cover all claims for fraud.
5 posted on
11/26/2016 5:15:17 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson