So, if ID rules rig the election for Trump, can’t we say that Motor Voter rules are intended to rig the election for the Democrats?
I hate to sound all hip hop, but “True da Vote!”
Motor voters, by definition, have licenses. So why should the Democrats be hating on that?
Under their theory, there should be no motor voter since fewer poor people probably have access to cars and/or are more likely to be in a position to drive without a license due to required fees, time, effort to get to the DMV or get time off to get a license, etc. Not saying that I believe this, rather that they change the narrative depending on the results they desire. We could as easily say that “motor voter is racist” since more minorities are in urban areas and people in urban areas often take public transit and have less need of a driver’s license. They believe they are so clever in twisting these narratives.