Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Resists Request for Additional Details on Private Email Server
Washington Free Beacon ^ | November 22, 2016 | Natalie Johnson

Posted on 11/22/2016 11:09:59 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

Hillary Clinton’s attorneys are resisting a demand from a conservative watchdog group to provide more information regarding the set-up of the private email server used during her time as secretary of state.

Clinton was compelled last month to submit formal answers about her private server to Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. She insisted multiple times that she did not recall being warned that her email practices could violate federal recordkeeping laws, Politico reported.

Five days before the presidential election, Judicial Watch filed a complaint with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Nov. 3 charging that Clinton failed to provide sufficient answers to the group’s questions.

Lawyers for Clinton responded to the complaint in a court filing submitted Monday claiming that two of the three questions put forth by Judicial Watch fell outside of the scope approved by a federal judge.

One of the questions pressed Clinton to detail where she arrived at the estimate that State Department systems had captured 90 percent to 95 percent of her work-related messages, according to Politico. Clinton’s attorneys said the estimate came from the former Democratic nominee’s conversations with her lawyers, which are protected by attorney-client privilege.

The other question in contention asked Clinton to detail reasons for the server’s creation, which was established “to serve former President Bill Clinton years before his wife took office in 2009,” according to Politico.

The State Department also filed a response Monday supporting Clinton’s opposition to further questioning.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: hillary; hillarycrimes; hillaryemailserver; icantremember; jw; liedunderoath; perjury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2016 11:09:59 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

They have resisted from day one and every day since. How is this “news?”


2 posted on 11/22/2016 11:12:25 PM PST by JParris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; Bon mots

[ Hillary Clinton Resists Request for Additional Details on Private Email Server ]

What? Like with a cloth?


3 posted on 11/22/2016 11:13:57 PM PST by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

It’s illegal. It’s all the way illegal. Regardless of intent, regardless of content. She moved her top secret messaging off a secure gov’t server. I have never understood, from day #1, why any further detail is relevant. That she NEVER HAD a gov’t account means EVERY top secret of SCIP message she ever sent or received is automatically a law violation and had to be a law violation.

The guy who took pix of his submarine is in jail regardless of his intent. He is jail because the information (the image of the sub) moved from a secure location to an insecure location. I still see no equivocation about any of this.


4 posted on 11/22/2016 11:18:39 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (I had a cool idea for a new tagline and I forgot it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“I have never understood, from day #1, why any further detail is relevant.”

Because some animals are more equal than others. End of story.


5 posted on 11/22/2016 11:20:15 PM PST by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; ...
 photo 06be7c47-eea5-4d5d-b575-92eca2ec3110_zpsvxlqixyc.png

6 posted on 11/22/2016 11:35:25 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Is she still privey to daily security briefings? How or what service is she using now for yoga and recipes ?


7 posted on 11/22/2016 11:38:58 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Trump has taken a “hands off” position, which is as it should be. If he allows the DOJ to do its job, all is well.


8 posted on 11/22/2016 11:41:41 PM PST by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
She insisted multiple times that she did not recall being warned that her email practices could violate federal recordkeeping laws

Well then, Mrs. Clinton, you are either complicit or incompetent ... which one is it?

~ MM ~

9 posted on 11/22/2016 11:42:38 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight (Ich bin ein Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

So much for her calls of transperancy right before the election


10 posted on 11/22/2016 11:47:09 PM PST by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“insecure location.”

Non-secure location. Insecure location is when the location has low self-esteem. :)


11 posted on 11/22/2016 11:47:22 PM PST by PLMerite (Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: al baby

How many recovered emails from Hillary’s server actually discussed yoga?


12 posted on 11/23/2016 12:07:33 AM PST by a fool in paradise ( Democrats' last peaceful transfer of power was January 1981.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

This no makeup, shuffling in the woods, roaming in a bookstore routine is a calculated act. The Clintons never do anything by chance. She’s playing Hillary ‘The Chin’ Gigante to avoid prosecution by the Trump administration, or at least by an independent counsel. “Don’t investigate me, bro’ !!!”


13 posted on 11/23/2016 1:09:15 AM PST by nickedknack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Clinton’s attorneys said the estimate came from the former Democratic nominee’s conversations with her lawyers, which are protected by attorney-client privilege.

Can someone explain to me how Clinton's lawyers can know how large percentage of the work-related e-mails had been captured by the State Dept Systems, and in that case why that knowledge is protected by attorney-client privilege?

Sounds like total BS.

14 posted on 11/23/2016 1:23:38 AM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

BINGO!!! Just having her ILLEGAL server should have gotten her ARRESTED IMMEDIATELY!!


15 posted on 11/23/2016 3:38:20 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickedknack
She’s playing Hillary ‘The Chin’ Gigante to avoid prosecution

All that's missing is the bathrobe. Just try to get THAT visual out of your head.......

16 posted on 11/23/2016 3:46:55 AM PST by paulcissa (Democrats want you unarmed so they can kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickedknack

Said that way, I think you have it right.


17 posted on 11/23/2016 3:50:33 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
>>Hillary Clinton’s attorneys are resisting a demand from a conservative watchdog group to provide more information regarding the set-up of the private email server used during her time as secretary of state.<<

The exact reason she should be prosecuted by the incoming administration. It's not about vengeance for an ugly campaign...it's truly about the rule of law.

Everyone being held accountable for their actions, regardless status, position or wealth. Otherwise, there is no rule of law.

Incidentally....I really hate that phrase. The rule of law.

18 posted on 11/23/2016 4:30:18 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

Agree, he needs to stay out of the picture and let the new DOJ be the bad cop


19 posted on 11/23/2016 5:55:59 AM PST by nevermorelenore ( I miss Reagan !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nevermorelenore

And the new head of the FBI....I hope!


20 posted on 11/23/2016 6:19:00 AM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson