Posted on 11/22/2016 7:41:12 AM PST by Lazamataz
President-elect Trump has made it clear that he is more than a little hostile towards the FCC’s implementation of net neutrality, both in his own words and, today, the appointment of two long-time adversaries of the policy to his transition team.
Jeffrey Eisenach is an economist and government veteran who worked at the FTC in the ’80s; he’s worked for a number of think tanks and research institutes that transmute industry money into custom expert critique, and under their auspices was a vocal opponent of the FCC’s current net neutrality rules. The New York Times did some excellent reporting on the man back in August, if you’re curious about the possibility of conflict of interest.
(Excerpt) Read more at techcrunch.com ...
It means that scumbag lying frauds who steal the valor of honorable Marines Soldiers and Patriots will never be welcome in our company.
As in *YOU* you prevaricating piece of crap.
(Tell us again about your "days of being entombed under the rubble." Or your 50 surgeries. Or being paralyzed and then walking and then being paralyzed again. Or maybe you've made up some new garbage to spew.)
Yip yip yahoo!
Not Tired Of Winning
Trump is putting people in charge who set up the Internet. Good. Make it safe for AMERICANS. We don’t need some political hack from Brussels, or some former-American like Zuckberg, or some nation like Niger telling Americans how to treat their Internet.
Keep an eye on my "The Daily Win" thread. I'll keep ya current. :)
NTOWY!
You have a ping list for all the winning?
“He should also repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 and go back to the 1947 law outlawing propaganda.”
There aren’t enough jail cells to hold the media dungballs who would be arrested.
MAGA! I don’t remember this much winning in my lifetime.
Every day’s like Christmas — only better!
Stop calling it net neutrality! It is anything but! Net neutrality was a
concept of nonninvolvement. The democrat FCC turned it into government intervention into making things “fair and balanced” for communists and failing languages.
It is all fraud. ObamaUncare, netneutralization, climate control and fixing, etc
Whaat? conflict ofninterests!? Like democrats and the FCC living dependently on a dime they never have to work for have no conflict of interest!! Horsesht!
Yep
Dumping net neutrality would be a big win...
“We need to dismantle net neutrality”
Why does anyone think this is a good idea? Please explain? Without net neutrality, the internet is going to become a much more ‘regulated’ and boring place.
Bring control of the Internet back to America.
Thanks for pinging on this one ... it’s important.
.
Net neutrality is theft of property.
Net neutrality is welfare for the goons that seek to destroy our society.
Should Jim have to have FR neutrality, and allow those with opposing opinions use his creation with reckless abandon?
You’re saying as much to those that build and maintain the internet infrastructure.
.
Net neutrality is the only reason sites like FR are able to exist in the first place. Otherwise, Jim and all the other small independent sites/blogs would be paying 10x the rate big sites like Facebook pay for bandwidth.
Net neutrality led to the renaissance in free speech that made Trump’s presidency a possiblity. Otherwise, we’d all be getting our news/information/political representation from whichever corporatist/globalist goons our “betters” decide, and being told it’s for our own good.
.
>> “Net neutrality is the only reason sites like FR are able to exist in the first place” <<
Mr. Eisenhower socialist, you are an idiot.
“net neutrality” is slowing us down drastically.
Before the socialist take-over installed their net neutrality everything moved freely.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.