Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nextrush

Politics aside, wouldn’t both Keystone & Dakota pipelines be beneficial?

Dakota Access line brings ND oil to an eastern market, and Keystone takes Canadian oil south. Two different oils.


52 posted on 11/21/2016 4:23:35 AM PST by redfreedom (The nation has been saved. Thank you Dear Lord. Long live President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: redfreedom

Kesytone XL was a bigger sized pipeline and in political terms it runs to a more loyal Republican voting state (Texas).

The Native Americans and or the Left may object to the big pipeline but it might be interesting for Trump to back out of the little pipeline in favor of doing the big pipeline again.

Canadian oil would have moved on it along with North Dakota’s and Justin Trudeau says he wants to work with Trump while the Alberta Premier, Socialist Rachel Notley, says she doesn’t want Albert’s energy resourced ‘landlocked’ especially with Trudeau imposing the carbon tax on the country in 2018.


65 posted on 11/21/2016 9:13:11 AM PST by Nextrush (Freedom is everybody's business: Remember Pastor Niemoller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson