Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LostPassword
True. But if we need to respond, ask why they can accept that KKK Robert Byrd could change but not Sessions?

This assumes Sessions was a racist or fan of the KKK in the first place. Be careful.

43 posted on 11/18/2016 1:34:25 PM PST by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: mbarker12474

> This assumes Sessions was a racist or fan of the KKK in the first place. Be careful.

He was by their definition. Changing their definition is usually impossible. Leading them to a different conclusion is realistic.

Most of the unending arguments (and real-life unfriending) I’ve seen are because people disagree on premise/definitions but argue implications/conclusions without realizing where the real disagreement is. It would have been different to realize the issue and go back to the premise/definition to continue the debate. If we can’t at least understand each other’s premise we will never understand what comes from it.

In this case I think it’s possible to stipulate a definition (without agreeing), but still have a useful discussion of the conclusion. We know/understand the premise here even if we disagree with it. And I think it’s possible to change minds without changing their definition of “racist” (which won’t likely happen).


53 posted on 11/18/2016 1:55:28 PM PST by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson