ALERT: These 7 Cities Want to KEEP Illegals… Do You Live Near One…

Conservative Tribune ^ | 11/17/2016

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

One of the hallmarks of President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign was his pledge to crack down on illegal immigration, most notably through construction of a more secure border wall and through the deportation of illegals who have committed further criminal acts while in the country.

However, a number of Democrat-dominated urban centers across the land have in turn pledged to resist Trump’s efforts by doubling down on their self-proclaimed status as “sanctuary cities” that won’t cooperate with federal officials in the enforcement of immigration laws.

While there have been numerous sanctuary cities, counties and states for several years under the non-leadership of President Barack Obama, there are seven cities that have distinctly reiterated their non-cooperative stance following Trump’s election.

Those cities are: Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle.

The purported leaders of these cities, both political and in law enforcement, have vowed to oppose the incoming Trump administration’s efforts at upholding federal laws, in effect choosing to protect criminal illegal immigrants over their own citizens and the rest of the country.

A Trump administration could attempt to bring these cities in line with federal law through the court system, but that could prove expensive and time-consuming.

However, there is perhaps a better, more cost-efficient manner by which these cities could be compelled to cooperate with federal agencies, and that is through the withholding of federal funds to those particular jurisdictions.

[caseinpoint]

I do, just a little further east and over the Altamont. But I have a daughter who lives in San Ramon and my husband and I have been known to go far to find a nice bookstore.

[xrmusn]

All the NON Sanctuary cities should be taking donations and spending (soon to be saved) money on bus and rail tickets to a Sanctuary City.

Brings new meaning to 'Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses etc etc, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, .'

When the 'other underclass' starts to feel the pinch and they rebel against the city AND the interlopers, the only place for them is the suburbs etc etc and that brings to mind.

NIMBY....NOT IN MY BACK YARD.

Then it will really get interesting.

EXAMPLE

Of course you should open half way houses for criminals and drug addicts.

I believe a city of this size could handle 3 of them.

s/Joe Bfsssltz

332 Maple

Ourtown

Dear JOE- thanks... there is a house for sale at 337 and 334 Maple and we will start there. So Glad you understand.

JOE....GFYS