“may take a few decades”
The entire population of the referenced county is 20,000.
That’s not much power in a democracy.
Clinton won Washington easily.
Shoot for the stars....hit the moon. Not too shabby
In 2012 Romney carried 22 counties. If you exclude the 3 counties of King (where Seattle is) and the 2 counties immediately north and south (Snohomish and Pierce), Romney had slightly over 50% of the vote in the rest of the state. I don’t know how Hillary’s numbers compare to 2012.
In 2012 Romney carried 22 counties. If you exclude the 3 counties of King (where Seattle is) and the 2 counties immediately north and south (Snohomish and Pierce), Romney had slightly over 50% of the vote in the rest of the state. I don’t know how Hillary’s numbers compare to 2012.
It’s indicative of many many counties in WA State.
Most of the state is red but the most populous are King and Pierce which are blue.
Most of the liberal base is government and schools, dependents on federal/state assistance.
Creating good private sector jobs in the state can reduce the liberal base or its turnout and shift momentum to red counties.
The write-up here is a good synopsis and accounting of the damage that liberal policies have wrought on the state especially in the red counties which make up all but about 2 of the 39 counties in the state.